Etc. -- Fruits, Veterans and Wages: 1918 Simcoe Town  Council
Introduction | Source Documents | Other Sources | Photocopies | Back

An edited partial transcript of a page 1 article in the 6 Jun 1918 Simcoe Reformer newspaper.

The regular June session of Simcoe council was held Monday night. All members present, Mayor Sihler in the chair.

His worship read a petition signed by a large number of ratepayers and residents. Also a petition from fruit dealers Philip Bonacorso and Arthur West to the effect that the early closing bylaw was practically putting them out of business, asking council to reconsider their cases and try to see their way clear to allow them to stay open.

Mr. Bonaccorso stated that he had a large family to support and as most of his business was done after 7 p.m.,  he was up against a tough proposition. Surely council did not want to see his children starve and he asked 
it to have a high heart and help him out.

Naturally, council was not of one turn of mind, as in the past. A few months ago, the town's money changed hands from one bank to the other, and then back again. Some of the members thought they had made a mistake in inserting the word fruits in the bylaw, and some thought otherwise. 

The matter was brought to a head by referring the question to the industrial committee to deal with and report.

----- ----- ----- -----

Albert Wakeford, a returned soldier, wrote council as follows:

Before I enlisted in the C.E.F. on 10 Jan 1916, I was in the employ of the town as road foreman. At the time I enlisted it was generally understood that returned soldiers would be given the opportunity of having their old jobs back again after the war or when they were discharged.

After I was discharged, I asked Mr. Carter, the chairman of the board of works, if I might have my old job back. But there seem to have been some changes. I am still suffering more or less from the wound and a piece of shapnel still in my leg, so I feel I could do the work I did before enlisting better than I could other work.

I would therefore be glad to take up the work I gave up to enlist.

In reference to the above letter Alderman Jackson said that he thought Mr. Wakeford should have his job given back to him. Surely the council did not want to go on record as not having been on the square. It should live up to the promise made.

Chairman Carter of the board of works wanted it understood that Mr. Wakeford had inferred that council had promised him his old job back, while that understanding came from recruiting officers.

Reeve Carter said he hardly knew what to do as the matter placed him in a rather uncomfortable position. 

The road commissioner now in the employ of the town was an A-plus man in every particular, and he did not wish any break in the department at the present time.

During Mr. Wakeford's absence there had been additional machinery in connection with the present system of road work, that Wakeford thought he could not handle.

He had offered him a job on the board of works, but he did not feel satisfied unless he got his old job back. Mr. Carter pointed out that Wakeford had an offer of a good job with just as good wages and a chance of an increase, but he had rejected it.

Alderman Jackson's motion to re-instate 
Mr. Wakeford was rejected. The amendment referring it to the board of works carried.

----- ----- ----- -----

Chairman Jackson of the Police committee, reported that both Chief Canning and Constable Pepper had applied for an increased in salary. Pepper has since handed in his resignation., asking to be relieved as early as possible.

The committee recommended the chief be given a war bonus of $36 per annum or $3 a month, commencing 1 May 1918; and an advertisement be inserted in local papers for a constable to carry on the duties of night watchman at a salary of $30 a month.
 

 
Copyright 2015 John Cardiff